Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Afterwards he endured so you’re able to hope
It declaration of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally removed all of the menstruating female in the normal menstrual category and you will set her or him regarding unpredictable position of zava because most typical episodes past at least three days. Apparently their question is actually you to definitely considering the state-of-the-art clarifications necessary to choose whenever you’re niddah and if you can getting a good zava, you to definitely you are going to arrive at go awry with grievous outcomes. Very first the new decree got limited feeling; it appears to be getting become local, and could had been restricted to times when doubt is actually in it while the local population was not sufficiently learned to determine in the particularly activities ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi ). Indeed it wasn’t a standard decree for everyone off Israel, nevertheless are the initial step where advice. In the first a couple advice, Rabbi’s declaration works together with a lady who is generally a small zava or possibly good niddah. She actually is managed in the first case as an excellent niddah, with a beneficial 7-go out ages of impurity, in place of 1 day out-of impurity during the day off hemorrhaging, the signal having a small zava. In the next example she actually is managed just like the a niddah and a minor zava if the first-day is inside the lady ziva several months (this new eleven weeks between monthly period attacks). Regarding the 3rd state, she actually is addressed because a complete zava. All the about three rulings do the much more strict position.
BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. Amoraim could not dispute tannaitic rulings without tannaitic support but they created fences around the Torah to prevent inadvertent sins. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. ” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer dating Oklahoma. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.