(and why he could be probably completely wrong):
Why would he’s another James in the event the earliest one is still doing? 1638 is believed to-be the entire year out of immigration; the only real entryway when you look at the Parish ideas getting a great James Porter, son away from John and you will Anna Porter, is for usually the one “officially” in the above list which was Baptized 20 Feb 1627. Maybe this big date are signifying rather an use variety of material that have anyone who John Anna remaining James with once they went to America, or he had been re also baptized…? Only throwing content out there.
Unrealistic. Sometimes the guy and Sarah had been twins otherwise Anna had personal back to help you back pregnancies; not for the Parish info, nor said from inside the John Porter’s tend to.
Maybe its past son, in case so, he have to have passed away more youthful because there is not any mention of the a man Joseph in John Porter’s tend to – really, ok, ok, sure there was, however, one “kid Joseph Judson” is actually discussing a guy-in-law, perhaps not a biological son – this is certainly probably where in fact the confusion been. That records says Joseph grew up in Felsted, Essex, The united kingdomt – your family try gone by this time, therefore if that’s right, upcoming so it Joily.
ANNA-HANNAH-BO-BANNA-JOHANNA-FlowerANNA-FO-FANNA-ME-MI-MO-MANNA-Rose!
When reading through some Porter records and you may friends trees, gay hookup Cambridge there is particular certainly big dilemma which have Anna’s title and many girl and you can blend all of them right up – there is Anna and you will Flower, then there’s Johanna and Hannah, with one another become known as Anna, contributing to the latest misunderstandings.
Which have Anna, while i first started watching the woman also referred to as Flower, I considered that maybe John Porter nicknamed Anna his “Rose”, by using the moniker afterwards when naming one of its female. But, I discovered that John had an aunt Rose, and now imagine it absolutely was merely an early mistake where anyone perplexed Anna that have John’s sibling in the beginning and you may/or later employing daughter Rose, at the time of this lady death.
And additionally, I believe its oldest daughter, Anna (Anna for every Parish records) and you will Johanna usually noted on of a lot John Porter-Anna White histories, is you to definitely in addition to exact same. No Johanna is actually mentioned at the beginning of Parish ideas. Unsure in which the name Johanna originated in (even if We have a theory below and it is an enjoyable collection out-of mom father’s brands), in the will (note: dos eldest girl, Anna and you will Sara are not mentioned during the John’s often as they received the part after they partnered), adopting the a couple oldest sons, the kids is listed in beginning purchase (first males, then females), which have a keen Anna indexed history. If that’s the case, why other Anna? Encountered the basic Anna been going by Johanna by this big date, so that they age once again, otherwise was just about it usually Johanna, but mislisted inside Parish details? Did they call each of their ladies Anna. Did John produce his have a tendency to themselves otherwise was just about it transcribed because of the somebody? I am aware the newest youngest “Anna” is actually Hannah, and that audio almost the same.
Need far more browse, however, we realize you to definitely John Anna’s d Gaylord; Seem to, John Anna’s man John had a child named John exactly who married a beneficial Joanna Gaylord, who was simply this new Grandd Gaylord (so they really were cousins after they married); In the event a few generations away from, brand new resemblance during the labels are undeniable – my abdomen informs me that is probably the spot where the Anna/Johanna misunderstandings arises from.
IMMIGRATION
Intricate watercraft listings many of your very early arrivals is not available for different factors, but among those explanations was due to the fact for a period while in the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s Governor John Winthrop’s period, he decided to not need just one listing of guests and you can rather acknowledged just a total matter. His listing entry for about step 1 September 1638 hence accounted for 20 motorboat arrivals over that june is actually brief: